Strategy, methodology, and practical guidance for patent owners, IP attorneys, and technology transfer professionals.
ClaimHit does not rely on a single model's opinion. Multiple frontier models propose candidates in parallel, then every candidate is cross-checked against live web evidence and confirmed on manufacturer pages — surfaced as Good Match or Possible Match. Here is exactly how it works.
Read Article →If your patent covers a mandatory requirement in a published technical standard, every company implementing that standard may owe you a licence. This is what SEP analysis is, how FRAND licensing works, and how to run an SEP scan on ClaimHit.
From scan results to licensing conversation — a practical guide to the steps between finding an infringing product and taking action. What each stage costs, what decisions you face, and where ClaimHit fits into the workflow.
An AI Hit Chart and a formal attorney opinion serve different purposes at different stages of enforcement. This article explains when a chart is enough, when you need expert analysis, and what each document can and cannot be used for.
Markets change. Products launch. New companies enter your technology space. A company that was not infringing your patent eighteen months ago may be infringing it today. This is why re-running your search matters — and how ClaimHit lets you opt any search into monitoring on a schedule you set.
What each column means, how to interpret Insufficient Documentation versus None, how to verify evidence sources, and what the overall Hit Verdict actually tells you. A practical reference for practitioners using ClaimHit in client work.